The 3rd Generation Chastities from Mistress LoriSubmitted by: CBi am beginning my third year of being locked up 24/7/3?? in a Mistress Lori Steel Tube Chastity Device. my Mistress recently acquired two Lori Chastity devices of the most recent design which features an innovative new locking system. The Lori Chastity devices can be ordered for the "non-pierced" but to really get the full benefit and security of Lori's design the male on which it will be installed should really have either a Prince Albert or a frenum piercing or both. i suspect it is a good idea to have at least an 8 ga. piercing as well. i can't speak about a frenum piercing experience but i can honestly say that getting a Prince Albert or "P.A." is an absolute cakewalk: having blood drawn by a nurse is higher on my personal pain scale. The prospective male can get a P.A. piercing at the time his chastity is ordered; when it arrives, he should be healed enough to wear it immediately. The first generation Lori Chastities were unique in that they used a genital piercing to secure and lock the custom made-to-measure tube on to the male. The second generation Lori devices improved both comfort and security by adding either a locking "speed bump" attachment (a piercing on the shaft near the base of the penis) or a locking rear "teste ring" (essentially a cock ring that locked on behind the tube). These enhancements helped make the devices more secure with two locks instead of one. They also helped keep the weight of the tube off the front P.A. or frenum piercing and thus made the chastity more comfortable for long term wearers. The current third generation of the Mistress Lori product replaces the conventional mini-padlocks that were used to lock the device in place with a totally new locking system. The new system doesn't get in the way of bodily functions, doesn't get dirty and require frequent oiling, doesn't clang or rattle, and doesn't have any sharp edges. my Mistress now has an open ended P.A. version with rear locking ring she uses on me for everyday use. This version allows the head of my cock to protrude out the end of the tube and thus allows me some additional feelings and sensations. When Mistress wants to discipline me she switches to a fully hooded and caged version. This version denies me any pleasant sensations whatsoever. It also hurts like hell if i develop an erection. i have yet to have anything that i would consider a "spurting orgasm" while wearing either model. Mistress will periodically milk me for health reasons, usually leaving the device locked on. The best "output" i can manage under a milking, if i remain locked in the chastity, is a steady non-orgasmic dribble. No matter which device Mistress elects to use, it has become extremely obvious to both of us that my interest in pleasing her in every way increases geometrically with the chastisement while my skill and ability to orally satisfy her increases astronomically. i look forward to an evening of pleasing her and pleasing her again and again without any kind of sexual "reward" whatsoever. The Mistress Lori website doesn't really show how the new locks work, so i'll try to explain: The new locks screw into place with a circular key that looks not unlike what people see on computers. The circular front edge of the key has ridges that match with grooves similarly placed on the lock. Unlike a computer security key, the Lori locks do not open or close with a 1/4 turn twist clockwise or counter-clockwise. Instead, the key is inserted until the key's ridges mate with the lock's grooves; then the keyholder simply keeps turning and turning the key, like a screw, until it loosens up or locks down completely. i wondered if a fairly strong person with very dry hands and some sandpaper couldn't just twist the round lock body itself in a counter-clockwise direction while pulling outward and unlock the device in this manner... The Lori device has a design feature that prevents this type of "escape": The bottom or back of each lock (left, above) has a semi-circular protrusion that aligns with a matching depression on the chastity device tube (above, right). Once these two items are properly mated together and the lock is completely screwed in and down all the way, you are in the chastity until your keyholder decides otherwise. The rear locking "teste ring" has a round knob that fits in the hole at the back of the chastity tube (above, right). This knob has a threaded hole into which the lock is then screwed. On the front of the chastity tube, a P.A. or frenun stainless steel pin is inserted through the steel tube and then into the piercing. The end of this stainless steel pin sits in a recessed area and another lock is screwed down into the tube, covering the end of the stainless steel pin and thus preventing any extraction. Note that these new locks have the added benefit of being pick proof. Once the semi-circular protrusion on the lock's base is mated tightly together with the corresponding depression on the chastity tube, there are absolutely no exposed surfaces that can be cut with bolt cutters or sawed through, unlike a conventional hasp on a padlock. So, word to the wise, once on, this is only coming off at your keyholder's fancy . You can see where the rear teste ring locks on to the chastity tube in the upper part of the photo. You can also see a second lock that holds the curved P.A. pin in place at the bottom front of the tube. This model has a leash ring on the top of the tube. Note that the slave I.D. tag hanging from a guiche piercing (lower left) is not part of the chastity and should be considered "optional equipment". Both Mistress and i have noticed the improvements in fit and finish of the Mistress Lori Chastity devices over the last two years. paulie, who makes them for Mistress Lori, has come a long way as a metal artist and this latest version of their product really stands miles and aisles above any other competing product. Absolutely no other device in our opinion even comes close to the quality, fit, comfort and total security of these new 3rd generation Mistress Lori Chastities.
[ Back to product review page ] Page last updated 04-Jun-03 by: Altairboy@aol.com |