Comment on Sharon's Luck - Part III

In the "thought experiment" of Part II we had "your" boss, Sharon, appearing at the office, for the first time locked into her Chastity and Correction uniform, a vastly modified version of what Scott in his original story so vividly described for us. Now what she is suffering can be concealed, presuming adequate care in the selection of outer clothing and in how she conducts herself. Only "you" and Sharon know. (There are logical gaps in my text. For instance, how can Sharons's conviction for prostitution and her enrollment in the Alternative Sentencing/Revenue Enhancement Program be kept secret?) You hope for an improved business and personal relationship with Sharon by virtue of your high bid for custody of the keys. Let me specify further that Sharon knows someone has the keys, but not that it is you.

Sharon, of course, has been speculating about the reason for her (bad) luck and wondering what some high roller of her aquaintance may have in mind for her. Or maybe it is the jealous wife of some executive with whom she has had an affair, who has nothing in mind other than to keep Sharon locked up and out of circulation (and suffering appropiate "correction.") Which prospect is worse? Of course, it could be you. She knows you are interested in the stock market. Maybe you made fortunate investments during the boom and got out in time. This possibility really scares her, because she is aware of her cruel enjoyment of your ill disguised and frustrated sexual arousal in her presence. Perhaps she even has entertained the fantasy of keeping you locked in a chastity belt for your presumption in looking at her as an object of desire. Could you have been reading her mind?

I would like to commission a painting of this moment when Sharon appears in the office, and her eyes meet yours. Other people are around, and something probably will be said about the day's business schedule. What then? Will you follow her into her office, jangling the keys in your hand? I think not. You have waited long enough for this moment and want to savor its prolongation. The picture will hang next to Perseus and Andromeda, St. George and the Dragon and other representations of the classic story of the chained damsel in distress and the hero who arrives in the nick of time to rescue her from the monster. In the modern interpretation, the hero and the monster are two sides of patriarchal man's fantasy of himself. The chained damsel is expected to comport herself in such a way as to convince him she is a real princess, and thus worthy of inspiring heroic rather than monstrous conduct. The artist seeks to capture her fear and loathing of the monster combined with the chaste dignity of a princess twisted artistically by her chains into an involuntarily lacivious posture, and exposed in partial or total nudity. We are invited to cast ourselves alternatively as princess, hero and monster, imagining various possiblities for playing out the situation.

Technically, of course, our Sharon is not exposed and her chains are not visible. But she feels them and we in our mind's eye know how she is bound. Well, that is not quite right. We know, from Scott's text and illustrations what she would look like in a fully "public" chastity and correction uniform. But in our thought experiment we have not specified precisely what foundation garments (so to speak) we would feel if we probed at her or we would see if we started to remove her business clothes.

I would like now to take our thought experiment one step further beyond realism and to forget for the moment about convictions for prostitution and Alternative Sentencing/Revenue Enhancement programs. Let us suppose that, like St. George and Perseus, you had nothing (aside from your imagination) to do with causing Sharon's plight, but that one business day you simply found yourself with the keys in your pocket and Sharon suddenly became aware of what we call a chastity and correction uniform in place of her usual undergarments. You know. She doesn't and is panicked, but tries not to show it as she beats a fast retreat to the ladies room to investigate. She learns something about the uniform and realizes that she knows what steps she will have to take to perform everyday sanitary functions. She sees the locks and realizes that someone, somewhere has the keys. Now she knows more than you do, because you don't know the specifics of the uniform. Only that it meets certain criteria: that it does not endanger her health or her sexual attractiveness and does not diminish her capacity for sexual arousal. (Indeed, we hope the psychological effect will be to enhance that capacity.) So we will have to do without an anal plug, and a vaginal plug, if any, will have to be of modest dimensions and allow for flushing to avoid toxic shock syndrome. We certainly will have to forego root-cinching of the breasts. If and when you use they keys you do not want to find that this well developed woman is sagging. Tight knee hobbbles probably are impractical, but hopefully some sort of thigh hobbling will be possible, permitting sitting on the edge of a chair and allowing a near normal walking gait. All this will have to take place on a day when she is wearing a skirt or dress to work. Slacks no longer will be an option for her.

But Sharon has a busy schedule and can't linger long in the bathroom. During the day, or perhaps over several days, she gradually becomes aware that she is in less distress in your presence than when she is apart from you. A critical remark or impatient glance from her is followed by a sudden jolt and she feels the locked uniform biting into her flesh. On the other hand, asking your advice or suggesting you make the presentation to an important client results in a feeling of near comfort. However, any social or sexual initiative on her part will cause a severe jolt, as will hinting at her plight or alluding to keys. You, of course, can take whatever initiative you choose. As with Perseus, Andromeda and the sea monster, we can gaze at the picture and imagine various scenarios. I would like to specify that your posession of the keys does not give you any rights to use them without her consent.

These thought experiments are offered as a context for thinking about how to resolve problems that occur in our relations with certain women in these times. I am thinking, of course, of women who provoke sexual arousal in us, but who choose another partner for gratification of their own sexual impulse. But our Sharons can cause another problem even if they gratify our egos by being too immediately resposive to our advances, saying "OK, let's do it!"

[ Back to chastity fiction page ]

Page last updated 02-Jun-25 by: Altairboy@aol.com