Comment on Sharon's Luck - Part II

Scott's Sharon is a successful business executive of 36 who is enrolled in an alternative sentencing program for convicted prostitutes and now she goes about what used to be her ordinary life locked in a very severe and humiliating uniform of public chastity and correction. The story is not realistic because the uniform is too severe to be endured. Her conviction of a crime she did not actually commit is, however, not unrealistic. Realism, however, is not the point if we regard the story as what Einstein called a thought experiment.

Let us extend the experiment by supposing you are considering the prospect of a date with Sharon, with custody of keys to the equipment with which she is burdened. Let us suppose, further that Sharon, though younger than you, is your boss. She was hired from outside the firm to fill a position for which you were qualified and thought you should have. You tried to adapt and even made some suggestions of a possible social relationship, to which she reacted with polite and barely disguised amusement. You were, however, at her side a lot of the time, supplying information, preparing presentations she gave, carrying her briefcase and the like, though she rarely followed your suggestions. Now, however, following her conviction and given your custody of the keys, you have the prospect of a better business relationship and you probably will find her willing to submit to personal intimacy, contrary to her inclination. Anything for relief from her plight, even if only for a time. You should find her anxious to please. To have more dates, to enter into a more lasting personal relationship if she can motivate you to do so.

But wait! How do you happen to have custody of the keys? You paid for it. With money. The public authorities decided that the alternative sentencing program should be redesigned not just to cut the costs of incarceration, but to produce revenue for the state. What? This is the state which is determined to stamp out prostitution and to promote public morality. Yes. Prostitution leads to the pollution of our young women. Furthermore, it provides an alternative to low paid labor which is needed for the profits of business and the strength of our economy. And consider: our convicted prostitutes already are polluted. Granted, Sharon and probably many others in the alternative sentencing programs are not actually prostitutes, but in the eyes of officialdom they are. In renting out keys, the state is not fostering the continuation of prostitution, because the revenues go to the state and not to the program participants. The presence of women like Sharon in our society, who create by their presence widespread sexual arousal, but who make their own selective choice of sexual partners, creates a problem of toxic waste disposal. They promote excess production of ejaculate which, in the context of marital consumation can be considered sacremental, but which otherwise can be the occasion of self abuse or festering arousal. Why should some of this excess filth not be pumped back into the women who are responsible for its production. For our thought experiment I have hypothecated the "you" who has suffered the greatest affliction from exposure to Sharon, and who would be willing to make the high bid for custody of her keys.

But now you, as a consumer, should have some imput into how the state designs its program. Given your custody of the keys to Sharon, do you really want her conviction to be known and to have her show up at the office outfitted as Scott describes? Would you not prefer that your improved business and personal relationship with her should be seen to be with the same Sharon your colleagues have known before, with her new (and modified) chastity and correction uniform concealed under her usual business clothing? For women who would not command as high a price as Sharon, there might be a compromise between the public exposure of Scott's original ideal and the complete discrection we want for Sharon: perhaps a "convicted prostitute" collar to be visible and the jingling nipple bells to be heard. For the lowest grade women, who might not command a worthwhile price, and then only wanted for short term use, we might have something like Scott's original obscene exposure.

How can we be sure of getting the right women enrolled in the alternative sentencing program? Why not have a system for recording bids for women not yet convicted, so the police could focus attention where the demand is greatest?

To conclude, let's go back and look at things from Sharon's point of view. She wants occasionally to play games, to dress sluttily and have a sexual adventure. But not to risk conviction for prostitution. What she needs is a straightforward, non-punitive chastity belt, the key to which she does not have ready access, and which she can demonstrate has been worn continuously for a long time. Of course, she will in that case have to forego consumation of her adventures.

[ Comments continue in part 3 ]
[ Back to chastity fiction page ]

Page last updated 02-Jun-04 by: Altairboy@aol.com