The Psychology of chastity belt wearer(s)

Submitted by: Anonymous

Altairboy,

Last month my wife and had had a unique experience . I have been a chastilock wearer for four years now and the subject of "enforced" chastity came up at a University gathering .

Being quizzed and examined by 10 students and other professors was only mildly embarassing, but the consensus was unimous.

The techster and Techie


The psychology of "enforced chastity"

The use of a chastity device for the improvement of male sexual performance.

It was more than three years ago when my wife of 30 plus suggested that the use of enforced chastity might improve my sexual performance.

It was no secret that several times per week, before the use of a chastity device, I would have an erotic dream which usually ended with me quietly masturbating to the point of ejaculation. She noticed that the morning after such an episode I would have a soft erection, if any at all.

One night we ran into Altairboy's website and discussed chastity devices. Neither one of us had never seen a male device and decided to take a good look at them.

She commented, "I think such a device should be stimulating in itself, prevent masturbation of any form of sexual relief, yet stimulating to wear. I want it to be a big reminder of who your sex belongs to. I want to tease you, make you go crazy wanting me. I am your keyholder. I want you to please me and I want to please you, not punish you or deny you sex for any long period of time. After a male is so much easier and sanitary to control than a female, not belts or chains, just a simple padlock."

I laughed and responded," You're the engineer, you design it and I'll wear it!"

Thus after a visit to a hardware store and a week of prototypes "the Chastilock" was born. The first version was just a modified lock. The big mod to this lock was a "m" shaped block of fiber reinforced plastic on the body of the lock. This one small addition made the lock fit really securely. When it was cut and filed correctly it permitted normal unrestricted urination, yet at the same time it both forced the loop of the lock into the groove behind the glans or head of my penis and "dug in" below the glans making the Chastilock secure and absolutely not removable.

Locking the Chastilock it is a two-handed operation for I must pull or stretch my penis In order to widen the gap between the glans and the shaft, this also tightens the skin and prevents my getting pinched as the lock clicks.

The Chastilock is not uncomfortable to wear for an extended period of time, nor is it too comfortable either.

At home she attaches a small chromed chain locked onto the forward control ring? That is to exaggerate every movement. It's sway with every movement it reminds the wearer (me) that it is definitely there and your sex was under the control of your keyholder. The lock also acts like a Kahli Teeth bracelet and rigidly enforces the "no-erection rule" with very uncomfortable to painful feeling.

At first my wife had me remain nude, walk, run and do everything I normally do so she could evaluate her design. Then she had me dress and watched me urinate.

Wearing the Chastilock, it was no problem. The Chastilock slid neatly through the fly in my trousers and underwear.

She then remarked, "Since this is my show, I want you to experience first hand some of the problems I experience when I have to take a pee. Unlike you men I can't just turn my back, open my fly and take a whiz. I have to drop my pants, underwear and squat. "

Thus the three steel rings were welded onto the lock's loop, now when I am wearing the Chastilock I must drop my slacks and underwear to urinate. With that modification I became a user of public restroom stalls.

Unlike the "submissive chastized males" I read about on the net, I am wearing my chastity device solely to improve my sexual performance. I am lucky enough to be married to a woman who demands daily intercourse.

On weekdays our personal "drill" is always the same. At 5 A.M. I bring coffee and daily vitamins up to our room, then after a bit of in the bed snuggling I disrobe her and give her a head-to-toe massage concluding with a stimulating "personal massage". If she is satisfied, which she usually is, I am given the keys, she rolls over and I perform bringing us both to a warm loving mutual orgasm.

On weekends the drill is different, I must massage her and then using a few adult "toys", my hands and orally I must stimulate her until she literally begs for sex. Then and only then am I given the keys.

After showering and applying lotion to my penis I put the lock on again and I hand her the keys, which are on a gold chain that she proudly wears about her pretty neck.

For the next 23 hours the Chastilock is a stern reminder of the fact that my sex is under the control of my loving wife and keyholder. It is a teaser, for its gentle sway with every movement is as if she were handling my penis and balls.

Last week we were at a party attended by University students and other professors the subject of chastity came up when one grad student said out right that she and her fiance' wore chastity belts and each held the other's key(s). She further stated that it was fun and "erotic as all hell."

Her fiance agreed proudly displaying his key.

An old professor an Englishman in his 70's announced, "All this chastity belt stuff sound perverted to me."

My wife spoke up saying," You don't know what you're talking about. Did you know a chastity device can also improve an old married couple's sex life?"

She held up her key.

Of course everyone stared at me.

I nodded, "Yes she has the key to my sexuality and I am not intimidated by this fact, but I am constantly stimulated the device itself so when it is removed I am ready to make love to her."

Our host, a well published psychology professor, then announced, " Who said we can't have fun and learn at the same time? I smell the topic for some unique creative research. Divide into teams and begin interviews. We'll have an analysis in one hour."

My wife and I and the other couple went into the dining room and held court with about 10 interviewers 7 grad students and 3 professors quizzing us about our lifestyle, sex life, youthful experiments with sex, pre-marital sex, dominance in marriage, extra-marital affairs, masturbation, nocturnal emissions and sexual orientation. The last group asked us about what we thought about my responsibility as both one who is chastized and keyholder, did wearing the device change your feelings toward your keyholder.

Then came the tough questions:

  • Did the device hurt?
  • Did you feel subordinate or inferior while wearing it?
  • While wearing the device did it change the way you looked at member of the opposite sex?
  • Would you mind showing us the device?
  • Are you self-conscious in public.

The other couple disrobed unveiling their chastity belts, at my wife's request I did the same. Their devices while accomplishing the same function, namely that of chastity, did also preclude touching any part of one's sex. In effect a sexual isolation tank.

My chastity device, the "Chastilock" did prohibit masturbation, sex, or even an erection. It by itself was stimulating.

In effect the general feeling was that my sex was almost in a condition of "sensory overload" since every step, every movement teased me and at the same time reminded of my captive sexuality.

A few of the grad students asked my permission to touch the device, they twisted my penis so they could observe all angles, and lightly tugged to see just how secure it was.

Later that evening the "jury" met and discussed their research and announced their findings:

  • That since this was consensual behavior we were within the boundaries of "normal" sexual behavior.
  • That by having the trust, faith and emotional attachment to place oneself in such a device we were all ( both couples) were object lessons in fidelity and love.
  • The fact that all of the parties involved, both chastised and keyholder, were happy and emotionally stable with stronger than usual romantic and sexual relationships than "normal" couples or persons not using chastity devices, indicated that our lives and psychological condition was maintained or improved by these devices.
  • Lastly that the addition of these chastity devices to our lives did give a state of emotional and sexual dependence on our lovers/keyholders, did "enhance" our personal sexuality and contribute to our emotional stability..


You can read about the "chastilock" device
Here, here, here, here, and here
[ back for more chastity related items ]

Page last updated 01-Jun-13 by: Altairboy@aol.com