CB2000 ineffective on Notchasteyet

Hi;

I like your site. I guess I'm delurking here in a way. There are sorta three parts to this post, my review of the CB2000, some other thoughts about chastity play without a dom or sub, or more aptly, each functioning as both. The third part deals with my suggestions and opinions on today's designs, and possible improvements.

I recently purchased a CB2000. When I first got it, the installed (smallest) A ring was too small for one of my testicles to pass through. The second size did it, one at a time then have to squeeze the penis through. I guess that's about as secure as it gets. NOT. On the second wearing I knew I could pull out and get back in. On the third or forth wearing (this was overnight) I was awakened by an ache in my left ball. I looked down to find it trapped almost in the middle between the rings. I decided to go get the key (of course) and as I stand up it completely gets through ! Ouch. I learned that balls are organs without bones and thus can flatten themselves a bit. Also the device may have given a bit over those hours.

I didn't change rings, how could I ?, but the spacers. I switched to the next smaller spacer set and now it's better. I've also learned that if you stretch the scrotum downward and give your balls some room it will be alot more comfortable when sitting or laying on your side.

I can still pull out because I'm a shrinker, but that's not my greatest disappointment. While I'm a shrinker, when I get hard I get ROCK HARD. It's big enough but it REALLY doesn't want to bend. When wearing the CB2000 it bulges out of the cage so much that I found I could cum by rubbing my underwear up and down profusely. It takes a bit of effort, but I did it. This wasn't the most intense orgasm I've had, but it was one of the more prolonged. I had to use alot of fingers to move the fabric of my briefs parallel to the bars on the cage part. It took a while, and it took a wannabe hard on that looked like it wanted to bust out of there and wipe out the block. Now I understand how my ball almost got through the rings before.

Undaunted in my quest for denial I thought about it. I have chains and locks and a tight pair of biker shorts (pretty much a panty girdle for a man) but the spandex can be too . . . . .know what I mean ?

To solve this I got some Depends overnight fitted briefs. With a diaper surely I could not get off. What's more then I put the biker shorts on and affixed a chain system that would assure that I could not take anything off. Like this you can't get a grip on the plastic cover of the Depends, and the chains keep you from taking the shorts off. Tossed the keys. Took me three hours.

I had to hump the bed to get off, and the orgasm again wasn't all that intense, but it was more prolonged. I'm starting to wonder about multiple male orgasms at this point. Orgasm is NOT strictly caused by manual stimulation, how else could you explain wet dreams ? I'm not talking about the same thing as the people with the electrostimulation, I'm talking about in a wet dream you can cum with NO stimulation, at least in the physical sense. I would consider electricity to be a physical stimulus.

I don't want to detract from the makers of the CB2000, it probably works well for "normal" people. From looking at the CB3000 I'm pretty sure it'll keep me from getting my jollies (unless I can still pull out). I don't wan't the Points Of Intrigue, I'm not into a KTB. While I might try it, it's not my main "thing".

I might like to try a CS100 from Chastitysteel (?). It's an interesting design. No ass chains, but it has a belt in addition to the ball trap and it's stainless steel. I kinda wish they had a titanium alloy version of the CB3000 and a belt like that. Back to the CS100, if the tube is shorter than you when hard, you are immobilized completely. No stimulation unless you have tools or the key.

At least that's what it looks like.

Now to part two. Bondage in which each is dependant upon the other for release, and I mean for real. To start with a short step for this crowd, what if she is your keyholder, but you are also hers ? Imagine the fun you could both have exploring the rest of each other's bodies. The game is basically who could last longer then. The trick in making this work right is to make sure the codependency lasts as long as possible. I mean from the very first step, or "layer" of bondage to the last, and then from the last on back. She has the keys to this, you have the keys to that, get it ? Might be fun. Even a bit long term in a CB, but it's both of us or nothing. I don't want someone who can dish it out but can't take it.

Basically I'm looking for a switch who can multi-task. Picture this, we are both wearing something that prevents sexual stimulation, whether it's chastity belts or diapers and clothing does not matter. What matters is the forms of bondage who is in. Disregarding the method of chastity right now let's go to the nuts and bolts of what I'm talking about.

You, my sweet, will be wearing a body harness that keeps your arms and wrists at your sides. Your wrists are at thigh level, which is about 16", too low to reach the key for the Posey mitts that you put on me. The key to the locks on your harness is inside one of my mitts, so I have to lift you up a foot and a half to reach it, and you must then undo the mitts. I cannot. Of course we are chained together, and that's the last thing to come off.

As you can see, I guess I need a switch who can multitask. I want a woman who always has been female and I am a man who always was male. I would prefer an open mind in other fields, like politics, religion and money. I have a life and intend to keep it, you have a life, by all means. When we get together for our private little circus, let's have fun, but kinda leave it there at least for now. Of course we each need a friend who knows where we're at until we get to know each other.

Anyway my last word (at the moment) to CB makers is MAKE THEM ADJUSABLE. Think, three sizes of codpiece (front) and three sizes of belt make NINE sizes. If you make the codpieces adjusable at the top, then all that's left is chain length and tube dimesions. I could give more detail, but no time right now.

Maybe I'll change my handle to Wannabebeltmaker.

Anyway I just thought I'd express my appreciation for your site and, for a change, actually contribute something.

Notchasteyet

[ Back to product review page ]

Page last updated 04-Dec-04 by: Altairboy@aol.com