REPORT BY CB-2000 KEYHOLDER

Recently you received a report from my husband under the pen name Chastity Novice. As his wife-lover-keyholder-mistress, I thought you might be interested in the feminine perspective of his first few days with the CB-2000.

We've been married over 30 years, and have had a loving and reasonably active sex life. I've known about and tolerated his cross-dressing for most of that time. Frankly, I find it weird but he obviously enjoys it so much it would be cruel to deny him the opportunity.

His fascination with chastity belts goes back to our dating days. I vividly recall him mentioning the concept not long after we were engaged. It came up as an aside in another conversation that I now suspect was designed to measure my interest which at that time was nil.

Since the Net became popular, he often shows me interesting sites related to kinky sex, and I noticed a few years ago that he was including your site in the show from time to time. Eventually, he told me very shame-facedly that he wanted a chastity belt for himself, and after he had whimpered about it for a long time you other wives know the male behavior I am talking about I finally agreed. I guess it is the male mid-life crisis thing thank God he didn't get fixated on having a convertible or a trophy wife instead.

He proudly showed me his report of the first two trials with the CB-2000, so I won't repeat what he wrote there.

I do want to emphasize though how often he has mentioned the effectiveness of the device in shielding the head of the penis from all sensation. I had never realized this, but apparently the head of a man's cock is constantly rubbing against his clothing, producing a state of continual low-level arousal. It tells you something about why they behave the way they do, doesn't it, girls? Perhaps the secret to the sexual revolution is just to dress all men in chaps that allow their cocks to hang free and unstimulated. I bet without the constant arousal they would quickly calm down and act like normal human beings (i.e., more like women.) And the "up-front" (excuse the pun!) view we girls would get of a guy's equipment would certainly add a new wrinkle to the mating game!

Now, here is a key thing we learned. The security and comfort factor required for long term wear are affected both by the size of the ring behind the balls and the length of the locking post. Let me give you an example.

After he wrote the review for you, we locked Hubby up nicely for his first overnight session. We were using the largest ring (more on that later) and the shortest locking post. About 2 a.m. he got out of bed and began flailing around in the bathroom. That got me up too. It seems he had awakened with what he described as a "raging hard-on." (In 30 years of marriage, I had never heard this term I guess it is guy-talk. I gather this kind of subconscious involuntary erection happens several times a night with guys. It tells you a bit about how their minds are wired, doesn't it?)

The cock part was being nicely contained by the cage, though you could see the penis flesh bulging against the bars. His balls, though, were swollen and purple between the front and back rings and he was obviously in serious pain.

Even after unlocking the padlock, we could not at first get the cage off the swollen cock to relieve the squeezing of the balls. We tried icing the whole area to reduce the blood flow, but it seemed to both of us to take forever. At one point, I made it unintentionally worse by suggesting we might have to go to the emergency room and "have it cut off." You should have seen the look in his face. When it was all over, he admitted he had thought at first I meant the cock, not the CB-2000!

We discussed the results so far the next morning. The two issues to deal with were obviously the squeezing of the balls and the ability of one of the balls to flow back through the ring and defeat the whole arrangement.

After looking at all the parts and some discussion, I proposed a smaller ring behind the balls and a longer locking post as a possible solution. His reaction was hilarious. He insisted that his cock would never fit through a smaller ring. I finally convinced him to try, and after lubricating him well with hand lotion (this really makes a difference) we popped him into the middle-sized ring on the second attempt.

Bottom line: he is now wearing two sizes smaller than what he claimed was the minimum. I use a set of spacers giving an 11/16" gap between the two rings. After several multi-hour sessions, we both think this is quite workable, as the balls are spread wide to hold the device in place but are not so compressed as to be uncomfortable. So far it seems very secure with none of the "creeping ball" problem we had earlier.

On final thought. I find his belief that he needed the largest ring so hilarious. Where DO guys get this fixation on cock size??? We'll know the sexual revolution has really arrived when men can rattle off their CB needs the way we girls know our bra sizes. Can you imagine boasting at girls' night out about your new guy who takes a 2" ring? Or picture the couples party of the future, with the ladies comparing notes in the presence of their husbands. "Oh, Sue! I can't believe Tom only takes a 1 5/8" ring and a 1 1/2" post. How does he ever satisfy you? My Bill was wearing that in junior high school!"

We'll keep you informed. This dingus looks like it is teaching a couple of old dogs some interesting new tricks.

Chastity Novice's Keyholder

[ Back to product review page ]

Page last updated 01-Dec-19 by: Altairboy@aol.com